Prejudice against interracial dating
A covered entity is also prohibited from requiring a medical examination or making a disability-related inquiry of an employee, unless the examination or inquiry is shown to be job-related and consistent with business necessity.These prohibitions protect an individual regardless of whether s/he is a qualified individual with a disability.Covered issues include, but are not limited to, the following: (1999) (available at gov).A charging party may allege that a reasonable accommodation was denied by a covered entity for a religious observance or practice. A charging party may also allege that a reasonable accommodation was denied by a covered entity for the known mental or physical limitations of an otherwise qualified individual with a disability.Discrimination in training programs might also constitute discrimination in hiring if participation in the program is required prior to employment, or regularly leads to employment.Title VII, the ADEA, and the ADA prohibit discrimination based on race, color, national origin, sex, religion, age, or disability in advertisements and recruitment related to employment, referral for employment, or apprenticeships or other training.
For example, a help-wanted advertisement that uses terms such as "young," "college student," or "recent college graduate" may deter individuals 40 or over from applying, and therefore would violate the ADEA.Religious discrimination also includes discrimination against someone because s/he is an atheist. Example 2 - CP alleges that her supervisor refused to promote her because she refused to engage in sexual relations with him. The ADEA prohibits age discrimination against individuals 40 years of age or older. In such cases, it is necessary to determine whether the individual has a disability Some investigation may be required before it can be determined whether an individual is a qualified individual with a disability.For further discussion of religious discrimination, refer to the Commission's "Guidelines on Discrimination Because of Religion," 29 C. CP has alleged discrimination based on sex covered by Title VII. If a charge alleges compensation discrimination based on sex, the investigator should treat it as alleging a violation under both Title VII and the EPA, subject to statutory requirements such as timeliness. For a more detailed discussion of age discrimination, refer to 29 C. When the investigator is uncertain about whether an individual is covered, the charge should be taken and the issue investigated. Part 1630; and Section 902: An individual is protected from retaliation for opposition to discrimination as long as s/he had a reasonable and good faith belief that s/he was opposing an unlawful discriminatory practice, and the manner of opposition was reasonable.Sometimes, however, an investigator will be unable to readily determine whether a particular threshold requirement has been met without additional investigation.
If a charge does not satisfy threshold requirements, it should be dismissed.The EEO statutes prohibit discrimination in labor organization practices, including referrals.In addition, a labor organization is prohibited from refusing to bring a grievance because of an individual's protected status, Thus, if two individuals are sexually harassed while participating in the respondent's training program but only one of them is the respondent's employee, they can both file a Title VII charge against the respondent.The investigator should consult with the legal unit if applicable case law differs from the Commission's position on a particular issue.